
Is the Queen a demi-god? Certainly she is a strong woman, judging by her reaction to Annie Leibovitz, who was photographing her at the time. Also the other sequence of her, striding down the corridor at high speed, whilst remonstrating with her Lady in Waiting, showed a woman, who at 80yrs, possessed the strength and fitness of a young woman – neither the robe, nor the poor footman seemed designed for such a high velocity. The whole thing seemed to have something of Jesus throwing the merchants out of the temple, or indeed Elvis aiming a hail of bullets at an unfortunate television receiver.
Ladies First however –
Was the BBC’s Blunder only a smokescreen?
In my opinion Yes. I personally think that it was a very deft piece of ‘attention deflecting.’ Amongst the hand-wringing apologies and indignant press reporting (even Helen Mirren gave a little poke at the Beeb’s misdemeanour), I could see the image of a little boy singing, “The King is in his altogether, his altogether, his altogether…” there he stood in my mind, a copy of Hans Christian Anderson under his arm…
You see, I don’t think it matters one jot if the Queen was filmed walking into or out of the photo session. It is of little consequence to me, if she was remonstrating with the Lady in Waiting or Annie Leibovitz or if she was going to, or coming from, the photo session; the almost amazing thing was that she ‘lost it’ and had a ‘go’ at someone – (and this is the important point) - whilst she was being filmed. The double-decker hamburger was the sleight of hand, smoke and mirrors furore that was subsequently presented to the public.
Like a conjurer pulling focus from the hand that would produce the rabbit, the media hyped-up the ‘disgrace’ of getting the sequences the wrong way round. So much emphasis was put on the ‘fact’ that the Queen had been wrongly represented by the BBC, that the actual dialogue between ‘Lillibet’ and Annie was in some way vilified and lumped together with the Beeb’s ‘misdemeanour and therefore the ‘untruth’ of it all.
“No, little boy. The King IS wearing his clothes – I’M telling you!”
Consider the exchanges:
Us photographer Annie Leibovitz looks at the Queen in her full regalia and states: “I think it will look better without the crown, because the garter robe is so extr…”
Before Ms Leibovitz can finish, ‘Lillibet’ appears, straightens her back so quickly that her head raises by around 3”; she fixes the Lennon-spectacled Annie L with an icy stare and retorts (indicating her robe)

“Less dressy?” – “What do you think this is?”
Later (or earlier) the Queen berates her Lady-in Waiting, whilst striding down a corridor (or up a corridor – does it really matter):

“I’m not changing anything. I’ve had enough dressing like this thank you very much.”
Notice how, in the corridor sequence, the Queen punctuates her anger with a double-handed gesture of rejection, the cut of her arm movements separating her from everything below…
http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30100-1274866,00.html( footage taken from a new BBC documentary entitled A Year With The Queen.)
Reverse the sequences; does it change or falsify the fact that the Queen had indeed, ‘flung a wobbler’?

The Queen’s full title in the United Kingdom is Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.
She is a Symbol

Is there no room for Lillibet?
~
Jesus is a spirit, a guide and a prophet in many religions, Christianity; Judaism, Islam all embrace him. Osho the Taoist guru even considered that his parables and teachings indicated that he must have travelled in the East. But what about Jesus the man? Did Jesus ever laugh? I don’t mean a gentle smile; I mean a great throbbing guffaw – a laugh that would bring tears of mirth down his face and catch his followers up in a burst of Joy. Take a look at the pictures below; do they offend or delight you?
Jesus is the Son of God

He is a symbol.

Is there no room for Jesus the man?

no time ago
or else a life
walking in the dark
i met Christ
Jesus my heart
flopped over
and lay still
while he passed as
close as I’m to you
yes closer
made of nothing
except loneliness
~E.E. Cummings
+
“My God my God, why hast thou forsaken me?”
That for me is the moment of gestalt; a flash of imperfection that touches me, and like my own father when I first saw him falter - The moment I can love him.
~
It could be considered that we create everything. Many years ago, I used to choreograph for the ‘Theatre of the Deaf’, a professional group of deaf actors. I remember an enthusiastic, very hippy-like girl, who had come over from the States and attached herself to us.

Koo Stark was enthusiastic and warm. I remember her visiting Liz and I and racing my young son up a small hill; then having coffee at our small flat in Addlestone Surrey. I liked Koo a lot and got on with her in an easy way…
A few years later, I arrived back in England, after working in Sweden, to see posters of young Koo as “Emily”.

This elevation of a friend to celebrity status has occurred many times in my life; the latest candidate for elevation is Lee Mead as the new “West End Joseph”. It always produces a slight distancing effect in me. It as if my ‘ordinary’ friend has become in some way more ‘special’ than an ordinary person. A sort of ‘God-Light’ has begun to shine.
An artist friend of mine remembers seeing Paul McCartney and Jane Asher, standing in the foyer of a London theatre. Trevor later remarked to me that “There was a light around them. They seemed to glow”…

Scrolling forward to early 1986 and I again found myself working with Koo. Koo was appearing at the (aptly named) Duke of York’s Theatre in St Martin’s Lane at around the time that Prince Andrew, who was previously her boyfriend, married Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson. It had been arranged that I would do some ‘movement’ classes with Koo. No matter how much I tried to recapture our easy friendship of our ‘Theatre of the Deaf” days, something within me kept a little distance….because she had become ‘different’ and ‘special’ – or perhaps I had created the separation?>
~

Elvis Presley is depicted on an altar candle in author Gregory Reece’s collection of Elvis art. Reece, a native of Limestone County who now lives in Montevallo, says Elvis is a popular religious figure in today’s culture.
One of Elvis’s favourite television programmes was “Monty Python’s Flying Circus” and his favourite character was the Eric Idle “Nudge nudge Wink wink” sketches. The concept of Elvis rolling about at the antics of John Cleese and Co, are somehow at odds with the image of Elvis the King…
http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/religion/060819/elvis.shtml
~
I remember sitting in the BBC canteen, during a break in recording “The Old Curiosity Shop”. I was around 18yrs and totally overawed by the “names” I was eating with. I tried to appear relaxed and friendly with the ‘special ones’ Michelle Dotrice (later to become Frank Spencer’s “Betty”), Patrick Troughton (a wonderful actor, later to become the second Dr. Who), and Anton Rogers, who I idolized, largely because when I turned up on the first day of rehearsals, managed to make me feel at home by making me a cup of tea.
There we all sat in the busy self-service area at lunch-break (me and the stars!) Anton and I (wow!) went to get the ‘afters’ - I chose apple pie and custard. I remember thinking how strange it was to have the custard in a glass jar with a metal screw cap and a spout. Nevertheless undaunted, I poured the yellow contents over my portion of apple pie and went back with my idol to the dinner table. I really adore apple pie and custard, but despite Michelle’s smile and Anton’s ‘Is it ok?’ I found it very difficult to eat my portion. Was I Overawed by their ‘special ness’? I undoubtedly was, but at the same time, it’s very difficult to rehearse after consuming apple-pie laced with half a jar of salad cream.
And yes…I did eat it (all of it)
And what of the relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalene?
The Gospel of Philip records: […] loved her more than all the disciples, and used to kiss her often on her mouth. The rest of the disciples […]. They said to him “Why do you love her more than all of us?” The Savior answered and said to them,” Why do I not love you like her? When a blind man and one who sees are both together in darkness, they are no different from one another. When the light comes, then he who sees will see the light, and he who is blind will remain in darkness.”
Whatever the relationship, it would seem that Jesus regarded Mary as of possessing a high spiritual evolution, higher than the male disciples and perhaps close to that of Jesus himself.
Were the Disciples Jealous?
The Gospel of Mary Magdalene states:
Peter said to Mary:
“Sister, we know that the Teacher loved you Differently from other women. Tell us whatever you remember Of any words he told you. Which we have not yet heard.”
So far so good, when Mary answers however, does Peter’s green eye of jealousy flash?
And Peter added, “How is it possible that the Teacher talked in this manner with a woman, about secrets of which we ourselves are ignorant?”
How about this one ladies…
“Must we change our customs and listen to this woman? Did he really choose her and prefer her to us?”
I am now in Da Vinci Code territory and it is easy to see why Dan Brown’s book has been such a success, even though the discovery of the Gnostic Gospels in Nag Hammadi occurred back in 1946. The Gospel of Mary Magdalene was actually unearthed in Cairo in 1896, some fifty years before. So why has their success been so long coming? My ‘take’ on it is that as a society, we are no longer so subservient to our ‘betters’. We now have a dual need:
Need 1
We need a Symbol to aspire to – to be greater than us - even supernatural
Need 2
We need to see that the symbol relates to us as human beings; that the symbol is personified as human - but without failings – In other words ‘a perfect person’
BUT…
We cannot tolerate absolute perfection; are as a society becoming increasingly secular and like to see a tiny glimpse of ‘human emotion’ on occasion – Jesus throwing the merchants and tradespeople out of the temple is an image that should give our Queen a certain re-assurance.
Now I think it can be seen more clearly, why the BBC went to such lengths to smokescreen the Queen’s betrayal of her natural anger. (Perhaps the ghost of little Lillibet had made an untimely appearance and smiling at the little boy with the Hans Christian Anderson book - just ‘went for it’). But the spirit of Lillibet is too human to be a symbol and must stay quietly in Elizabeth’s heart. Her Majesty need only have answered ‘I’d prefer to keep it on’ with a slight and meaningful smile and all would have been well, but no, King George’s strong spirited daughter shone through and in doing so, became for a glorious instant, the same as us all. (and I loved her for it.)

“They’re just like us really,” Christina my mother used to say. Well they are and they aren’t. We need our symbols and our leaders and we do need a touch of their human roots, but we also need to know that they are different; that they are something more than us.…and so we help make them into ‘something more’.

(woe betide them if they fail)‘till the next time
soulMerlin